A Cygnus Business Media Website            






Sponsored By:








Handguns to Hands-On

De-escalating while Engaging


Posted: Monday, June 29, 2009
Updated: June 24th, 2009 07:00 AM GMT-05:00

Most Read Stories TodayMost Read Most E-mailed Stories TodayMost E-mailed E-mail This StoryE-mail Article Print This StoryPrint Article

ROSS TORQUATO
Training Contributor


Drawing our hand guns can be a daily event depending on where you work. There are a variety of reasons why we draw are handguns; stopping a stolen car, dealing with a known violent felon, clearing a building during an alarm call, or in defense of our lives. As a result of these incidents, we spend a great deal of our training time on the range drawing and firing our weapons.

Another area we spend a large amount of training time is in controlling resistant or violent subjects. We need to be able to close distance, grab and control the subject and apply handcuffs while minimizing injuries to ourselves and the subjects. We need to also be able to control a violent subject while maintaining our weapons, not getting hurt, and following all of the rules.

The issue with the above statements is the gap between firearms and defensive tactics training. The firearms instructors focus on drawing and hitting the target, which is extremely important. At the same time, when the defensive tactics instructors train, the students have their weapons in the holsters. At some point we need to work on holstering while engaging a subject.

For example, you respond to an alarm where you find an open door. As you and your partner enter, you will most likely draw your firearms. While clearing, you come across a male, casually dressed, who states that he is the business owner. We have all probably already dealt with this scenario. Most of the time the owner will walk toward you stating everything is fine. Since this is not a deadly force situation, you will have to holster. If the male is walking toward you and you begin to holster, you may need to go hands on. This may be a simple stiff arm/palm heel to the chest or an arm grab that turns into a takedown.

While writing this article, one of my friends and students got involved in an incident that required him to holster while engaging a violent individual.

The incident involved a call for a domestic where the male was throwing his live-in girlfriend’s property out of the trailer. As the deputies pulled up to the area, my friend saw the male shove the female back into the residence. As she fell to the floor, the male went into the trailer after her. Fearing the male would continue to hit the female or possibly barricade them both into the trailer, the deputy went after him. As the deputy entered the trailer, he saw the male moving toward the female who was now in the kitchen. As the deputy was yelling at the male, he saw the male open a kitchen drawer and pull out a ten-inch knife. The deputy was approximately five feet from the male and moving in fast.

The deputy, seeing the knife, drew his firearm and prepared to fire. He told me that as he brought his weapon up, he saw the female, who was standing behind the male, moving toward the male. The deputy told me he did not want to take the chance of shooting her if she stepped in the way, so he decided to holster and control the male. As he holstered, he delivered a forearm brachial strike to the male. Although the deputy did not know it at the time, the strike stunned the male and he dropped the knife. The deputy was able to take the male down after several more strikes and vertical stuns, and was able to handcuff the male.

Once the scene was secure, the male was taken to the hospital for cuts he received as a result of hitting a window. At the hospital the male, age 67, told the deputy that he grabbed the knife to use on the woman, not the deputy. He thanked the deputy for not shooting him. Although we know it doesn’t matter, this male had no criminal history and has not had any run-ins with law enforcement before this incident.

I found out about this incident when the deputy involved called to tell me about it and thank me for the class he attended where I stressed holstering while engaging. As an instructor, being told that a technique I taught has worked when it really mattered is like hitting the lottery.

Teaching your students the importance of holstering properly starts with qualifications and basic skills. How many times do you or your students look to your holster when you re-holster? Do you look at your holster when you are drawing your firearm? Probably not. When I watch officers shoot weather it's qualifications or during a course, I see many officers looking to their holster when they re-holster. I think this is more from habit than anything else. Once I or other instructors address the issue, the student will usually stop looking for a while. This demonstrates that they can re-holster without looking, but often still look because they don't appreciate the dangers of their actions.

To train yourself or your students to not look at the holster, you must be diligent. Every time you re-holster, make sure you do it without looking. Once you can do this smoothly, start working on adding more stress. Just like adding stress when you are shooting; i.e. moving, walking, taking cover, or engaging a suspect; these same drills should be incorporated into re-holstering. You can begin by being on target with your firearm, then step offline while re-holstering. Once you are comfortable with one step off line, start adding a re-direction with the other hand while moving and re-holstering.

You can expand these drills to anything you can think of just like when shooting. One drill that should be added, probably with a non lethal munitions weapon, is: While stepping off line and re-holstering, you start moving forward to the subject. As you start securing your weapon, a threat appears, the subject reaches for a weapon, and you have to draw again and assess the situation. Any stimulus you can add to these drills will allow you to be better prepared on the street.

Please do not misunderstand the above, if you feel that you need to have your weapon out and on target then keep it out. Your safety should be your first consideration.




Web Links:

Ross Torquato has been employed as a Brevard County Deputy Sheriff for 15 years. During that time, he has taught Defensive Tactics, Firearms, and Use of Force within the Department, at the local academy, to many of the areas agencies and has presented at several international law enforcement conferences to include ASLET, IALEFI, and ILEETA. He has taught self defense courses for several years based on his experiences as Law Enforcement officer.

» More Stories From Operations & Tactics



Share your thoughts, advice, opinions, and expertise @ Officer.com

     
Comments

Posted by DK
(06/29/09 - 01:01 PM)
This is a very good article.

I've had personal experience with this situation but only with Freeze P OC/CS spray. On January 2nd at 3am my partner and I were involved in a 415 with an Inmate.

I made the initial contact with the inmate and delivered a 2 second burst of spray to his face.

Now after I sprayed him I immediately went hands on (Mistake) and at the time I dropped my OC/CS spray (Mistake).

To make the story short I found my OC/CS spray laying next to the bunk of an inmate. Thankfully due to the lights being out and the color of the bottle no inmate saw it drop.

The inmate like every other inmate was more interested in the action that had just taken place instead of a dropped bottle of OC/CS.

Since that day I always say to myself if and when I get into another 415 "REHOLSTER, REHOLSTER, REHOLSTER"

I always praticed fast drawing but never made a mental note to reholster after making contact. It was always spray and handle business. Now it's spray, give out commands and go from there.



Posted by BPA
(06/29/09 - 03:00 PM)
I would not holster my gun while a knife was in play--especially to risk my life in a domestic.

That said, I understand it's easy to Monday morning quaterback, but I've been in a similar situation. Gun stays out.



Posted by Sherlock Holmes
(06/29/09 - 03:16 PM)
I WILL Monday morning quarterback this incident. Why on Earth would the deputy reholster while the suspect is still armed with a knife, and then be close enough todeliver a "forearm brachial strike." This is RIDICULOUS. I'm sorry but his concern that he did not want to chance of shooting the female by mistake just shows a lack of common sense and officer safety. MY life is more important. I would NEVER go up against a knife-weilding suspect bare-handed because I'm afraid that I might shoot the wrong person. If he was that poor of a shot he should be practicing his shooting skills. STUPID DECISIONS and POOR TACTICS like this are reasons why we keep reading about officers killed in the line of duty.



Posted by Watson in Las Vegas, NV
(06/29/09 - 03:49 PM)
If you post an article on this site, you are inviting "monday morning qb'ing". I agree with Holmes. I think its asinine to make it common practice to go hands on with a guy who has a knife. Now if this guy has trained enough that he iss Bourne-like, then thats his choice. Its his butt on the line. But expecting other officers to do the same, ehh WRONG!!! Its all about the percentages. Yes, it worked out for him but it was a low percentage gamble, not worth his life (not mention his family, other officers arriving to save him, etc.). Thats something that every officer has to weigh on each call; is the action worth the risk? Now whats wrong with keeping distance and using verbal commands??



Posted by HRPufnstuf
(06/29/09 - 06:12 PM)
Hands On
Brought a forearm to a knife fight? I don't think so! Anybody close enough to lay hands on is close enough he should NEVER miss with a pistol. What if the guy had shoved the knife into his ribs as he stepped forward? Wouldn't look so smart then, now would it? 878ro2



Posted by NCTxMn
(06/30/09 - 09:52 AM)
Re-holstering
I agree with the above posts about the man with the knife, but the point to take from the article is not the story; it is reholstering quickly and hopefully safely while engaging an (unarmed) subject. I teach my shooters to re-holster with one hand and to hold the other hand up and slightly extended, and to re-holster this way EVERY time, even at the beginning of the shift, or at the courthouse when retrieving the gun from a locker. The key is every time the same way. The thinking behind it is: if I had my gun out and the circumstances change I may still need to go hands on quickly while re-holstering. Some folks take the advice and practice it others ...well...don't!



Posted by BPA
(06/30/09 - 07:20 PM)
And with respect to every LEO here including the author and the officer in the anecdote, the point is worse. The "speed/stress holster+empty hands" training probably conditioned this officer to holster his gun and use a "brachial stun" (forearm to the chest?) in a situation that demanded the opposite. If you are conditioned from training to holster your gun and charge in empty handed during an adrenaline surge, that is a life threatening habit.

Holstering should be done when it is safe to do so after evaluating the situation. If someone is tackling you, beating you, choking you, and/or grabbing your weapons, or doing those things to a fellow officer, that's not the time to holster.

On the contrary, local LEOs (3 of ours) have shot at least 6 unarmed attackers, killing four and permanently injuring at least one other. All were found justified in using deadly force to stop these attacks by the DA or USA and all were back on duty.

Some trainers may expect too much martial arts from their officers than the law or agency requires.




Posted by RoboCop in Los Angeles
(07/01/09 - 10:25 AM)
"As the deputy was yelling at the male, he saw the male open a kitchen drawer and pull out a ten-inch knife. The deputy was approximately FIVE FEET from the male and moving in fast."

Sorry, but he's bought and paid for. I would immediately INCREASE the distance between me and the suspect and prepare to properly take out the threat. I would not reholster and advance to attempt to disarm him.





Posted by MCP in Maryland
(07/17/09 - 01:01 AM)
Flip Side
The biggest part of this problem is the addition of unnecessary equipment issued to officers. I'm speaking of OC, ASP and taser. These weapons have caused a significant increase in OFFICER FAILURE leading to injuries and death. There are TOO MANY options being forced onto officers. Hence, officers are choosing the wrong options for deadly force situations. There is an article that addresses this point wherein officers (mostly young) are pulling their Tasers when a suspect is armed with a gun, knife, etc. The days of the following a use of force ladder are long gone. Officers need to go UP AND ABOVE force used/displayed/threatened against them. If your adversary is using deadly force, SO DO YOU! Period. If an officer is injured/killed (or gets an "innocent civilian" killed) due to their FAILURE, shame on them and their badge.



Posted by Heath in Dallas, TX
(08/19/09 - 10:43 PM)
evolution
The problem here is that training hasn't evolved...the officer is the X Factor. We're taught to use deadly force as last option by being made scared of what comes afterwards from the time we're in the academy till now. A friend of mine did this say call, same response, but ended up with 80 stitches when done. I'm a 14 year vet and still an active lead instructor for the U.S. I've been to EVERY D.T. system out there(as an instructor), only one offers a complete package and trains for all levels, including this one. If any of you are serious about your life, safety, and others email me at heath@controlledforce.com and I promise I wont waste your time and I will those who are just like you tell you what time it since they've been through our complete program :) 1*









1  |   2  |  



Officer.com E-Mail Alerts
Sign Up for Free e-mail Alerts

Daily News & Features
Officer Down Alerts
Special Offers
Weekly Job Alerts